Asset Inventory
Connect original files, publication context, ownership records, licenses, and authorized uses to stable asset references.
Identify copied digital works, connect findings to ownership records, preserve source evidence, and support professional copyright enforcement workflows.

Copyright cases become difficult to manage when original assets, ownership records, licenses, external URLs, and platform responses live in separate systems. Shieldify IP structures these elements around a stable asset and case record so reviewers can understand what was created, where it appeared, and what authority exists to act.
The workflow can support single high-priority findings or recurring monitoring across websites, social channels, video platforms, and marketplaces. Coverage is defined by the works that matter most and the channels where unauthorized copying is most likely to create operational or commercial risk.
Evidence should show where the material appeared, how it was presented, who controlled the public source when visible, and when the use was captured. For edited images, cropped video, or combined content, factual comparison notes help professional reviewers assess the record without unsupported conclusions.
Before any action, the workflow confirms ownership, authority, licenses, and possible issues that require legal assessment. Submission references, responses, counter-notices, appeals, and reappearances remain connected to the case so teams retain a complete operating history.
Each engagement is scoped around the rights, channels, evidence standards, and review responsibilities relevant to the organization.
Connect original files, publication context, ownership records, licenses, and authorized uses to stable asset references.
Organize public findings involving images, video, written material, product content, software, and other creative works.
Prepare original-to-copy comparisons that distinguish observed similarities, edits, attribution, and known permissions.
Maintain platform notices, counter-notices, responses, follow-up requests, recurrence, and final case status.
A repeatable sequence keeps findings, evidence, decisions, actions, and outcomes connected.
Confirm the exact original asset, ownership record, publication history, license context, and authority to act.
Capture the source URL, account, timestamp, surrounding context, screenshots, and available metadata.
Compare the original and external use, check authorization, and route legal questions or possible exceptions appropriately.
Support platform-ready records and retain responses, counter-notices, reappearances, and closure reasons.
Clear expectations help teams choose the right monitoring, evidence, and response workflow.
Ask About Your ScenarioWorkflows may cover images, videos, written material, product content, designs, software, and other identifiable creative assets where ownership and authority can be documented.
Usually not by itself. A stronger record connects the screenshot and source URL to the original work, ownership or authority documents, timestamps, publication context, and relevant platform information.
No. Exceptions and defenses depend on the facts, jurisdiction, and applicable law. Qualified counsel should review legal questions when required.
The new finding can be connected to the earlier asset and case history, preserving recurrence patterns while treating each URL or account as its own evidence record.